It is a matter of principle and a conceptual question

Info icon This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: and other reduced descriptions of turbulence, in particular, as well as in construction of a kind of statistical mechanics of turbulence generally. It is a matter of principle and a conceptual question whether studying turbulence via (some) decompositions is aiding understanding of its fundamental physics. More that one hundred of experience sems to be a clear indication that it is not: I think that the k-space decomposition does actually obscure the physics, MOFFATT, 1990; see also LIEPMANN 1962, TENNKES 1976, and many others. __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ * It is well known that theoretical physics is at present almost helpless in dealing with the problem of strong interactions. LANDAU 1960. The situation in turbulence seems to be not better if not worse . # If we assume as a basic starting point in every theory of turbulence its representation in terms of spectral coefficients, statistical or physical averages, or more generally simple objects conditionally extracted by a weak background, turbulence modelling could be defined reductively, as the art of writing the equations that produce directly such quantities. GERMANO 1999 # Perhaps the biggest fallacy about turbulence is that it can be reliably described (statistically) by a system of equations which is far easier to solve than the full timedependent three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations BRADSHAW 1994 CONCLUDING CONCLUDING Too little is (still) known about the properties of Too real turbulence. So it seems not justified to put too much (pretty futile) efforts in it’s modeling which mostly is mimicking it without much understanding. Hence the necessity to follow the advice of LEONARDO DA VINCI: Remember, when discoursing about water, to induce first experience, then reason with the emphasis on the physical aspects based in the first place on observations and empirical facts as distinct from intuitive conjectures, hypotheses and ‘models’. The observational aspect is not that trivial as it The involves directly the skill/art/ability to ask the right and correctly posed questions. In our view the first priority should be given to study of basic physical mechanisms of turbulence with the emphasis on qualitative aspects, keeping in mind a somewhat old-fashioned view that curiosity drives better science than `strategies'. This priority includes the study of turbulence itself (per se), rather than multitudes of its models. (per The only exception seems to be the Navier-Stokes equations. A SMALL HOME WORK: WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE PAPER BELOW? THE OR WHY THE ‘RIGHT’ OR RESULT IS FOR THE RESULT WRONG REASON? WRONG...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern