This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: breach. History: The district court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Bigelow-Sanford, Inc. Issue: Should Bigelow’s cover purchases be used to measure damages against Gunny? Decision: Yes, the United States Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Bigelow. Reasons: UCC 2-711 and 2-713 provides for cover damages where the seller fails to make delivery or repudiates the contract. It was decided that the plaintiff made his cover purchases in a reasonable manner because the purchases were only made to replace several vendors’ shipments. There was no viable reason to believe that the purchases were not made in good faith....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/17/2011 for the course BLAW 300 taught by Professor King during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '11