This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Issue: Is Pacific Custom Pools subject to the entirety of the previously determined $959,131 payment for services? Decision: No, they are not. The trial court’s decision was affirmed. Reasons: Pacific Custom Pools (PCP) should have been reasonably certain that their contract was void for several reasons. PCP knew that their license was suspended and that the deadline date was January 31, 1996. They also knew that their renewal application sent in February was untimely. PCP was also advised in April of 1996 that their license had not been renewed because their filing fee check had been dishonored. Thus, PCP did not act in a reasonable manner to maintain licensure, so they are not subject to the full payment of $959,131....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/17/2011 for the course BLAW 300 taught by Professor King during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '11