Unformatted text preview: History: The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Sanders. Issue: Is the award of damages an adequate remedy in lieu of specific performance? Decision: The California Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Sanders for specific performance. Reasons: The nonappearance of Sander’s name in the credits of this film, without doubt, resulted in a loss of valued publicity. The remedy at hand is impossible to perform because it would be quite difficult to quantify this in monetary terms. Also, Sanders fully performed his contractual obligations by releasing the claims of copyright to the film; thus, the court permitted enforcement of the respondent’s performance as promised....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/17/2011 for the course BLAW 300 taught by Professor King during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '11