This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Issue: Did Scampoli breach the contract due to a breach of perfect tender to the plaintiff, Wilson? Decision: No, the trial courts decision was reversed. Reasons: The UCC provides that The seller, then, should be able to cure the defect under subsection in those cases in which he can do so without subjecting the buyer to any great inconvenience, risk, or loss. A minor repair falls within the above UCC clause requirements. Also, the removal of a television chassis for a short period of time does not result in a great inconvenience to the buyer. The Plaintiff refused to allow the defendant full access to the television so that the problem may have been rectified; thus, the defendant is not liable and did not show a breach of warranty....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/17/2011 for the course BLAW 300 taught by Professor King during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '11