Ant.101, wk4, ds2 economy and colonialism

ANT.101, WK4, DS2 Economy and Colonialism
Download Document
Showing pages : 1 - 3 of 7
This preview has blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version! View Full Document
Economy and Colonialism
Background image of page 1
Apply what you have read in Chapter 8 regarding colonialism and the expansion of capitalism in modern industrial societies to the article, “Marketers Pursue the Shallow Pocketed.” Is the information being discussed in this article another example of colonialism? Why or why not? Identify two potential positives and two negatives direct marketing of the poor has on people and their economies. What theory of development is most applicable to the expansion of global markets to poor, low income, and indigenous communities?
Background image of page 2
ECONOMY AND COLONIALISM Tarasha Hickson-Smith ANT.101 WEEK 4 DISCUSSION 2 Colonialism is the domination of one society by another, so yes this is a clear example of a company from a rich society capitalizing on a poor society (Nowak & Laird, 2010). Most indigenous countries like Brazil were forced to switch to capitalist mode of production in order to control the economy. This switch was more than likely a collaboration between the government of Brazil and predatory merchant MNC’s like McCann World Group that targeted the low-income consumers. There are obvious negative effects direct marketing has on poor people and their economy. For example, the homemakers may have found a way to supplement their low income by making some of the products themselves and selling them or trading them for a fair price. But by the bigger companies mass producing cheaper products and putting them in visible markets this would cut their supplemental income. Another negative is the poor quality the product will now have as a result of the new cheaper price, causing them to have to repurchase the product multiple times because of its low quality. However, there is a positive side to direct marketing it treats the low income consumer as a valued customer giving them a chance to buy similar products as upper class consumers at a price they can afford. Secondly, the retailer can restock the shelves with brands and products the low income consumer can identify with. This allows the low income merchant and consumer a better shopping experience that fits their income bracket. The theory that explains this at best is the
Background image of page 3
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.