section_2.09_answers - PHIL12A Section answers, 9 February...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: PHIL12A Section answers, 9 February 2011 Julian Jonker 1 How much do you know? 1. I have constructed a world in Tarskis World using objects named a through f , but Im not going to show it to you. Now consider the sentences below, and decide whether you can determine their truth value even though you cant see my world. You should be able to explain why or why not. (a) d=d We know that we can use the =Intro to introduce an identity at any point. Of course there must exist such an object in the world, but I have told you that objects a through f exist. So d=d must be true. (b) BackOf(b,a) BackOf(a,b) You cannot determine the truth value of this sentence without looking at the world. After all, if a and b are in the same row, then neither BackOf(b,a) nor BackOf(a,b) will be true. (c) LeftOf(e,f) RightOf(f,e) LeftOf(e,f) and RightOf(f,e) are equivalent, and if e and f are in the same column, then these will not be true. (d) b=a a 6 = b b=a is the same as a=b , and a 6 = b is its negation, so this sentence says that either a and b are identical objects, or they are not. One of the must be true, so the whole sentence is true, regardless of the world. (e) Large(a) Large(a) Either a is large, or it is not. So this sentence must be true, regardless of the world. 2. (Based on Ex 3.14) Is (Small(a) Small(b)) a logical consequence of Small(a) Small(b) ? If it is, write an informal proof. If it is not, describe a counterexample. The following counterexample shows that (Small(a) Small(b)) is not a logical consequence of Small(a) Small(b) Let a be a large object, and b be a small object. Then a is not small, so Small(a) is true and therefore Small(a) Small(b) is true. 1 However, (Small(a) Small(b)) is false, since (Small(a) Small(b)) is true, since Small(b) is true. 3. Is (Small(a) Small(b)) a logical consequence of Small(a) Small(b) ? If it is, write an informal proof. If it is not, describe a counterexample. Yes. Suppose Small(a) Small(b) is true. Then both conjuncts must be true, that is Small(a) is true and Small(b) is true. But then Small(a) is false and so is Small(b) . This just means that a is either medium or large, and b is either medium or large....
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

section_2.09_answers - PHIL12A Section answers, 9 February...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online