section_3.14_answers

section_3.14_answers - PHIL12A Section answers, 14 March...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PHIL12A Section answers, 14 March 2011 Julian Jonker 1 How much do you know? 1. Use truth tables to check whether the following equivalences hold: (a) P Q ⇔ ¬ Q → ¬ P P Q P Q ¬ Q → ¬ P T T T T T F T T F T T F T F F T F F F T F T F T T F T T T F F F F T F T F T T F (b) P Q ( P Q ) ( Q P ) P Q ( P Q ( P Q ) ( Q P ) T T T T T T T T T T T T T F T F F T F F F F T T F T F T T F T T F T F F F F F T F F T F T F T F 2. Translate the following arguments into the Blocks language, and then write informal proofs of their validity. Explicitly notes any inferences using modus ponens , biconditional elimination, or conditional proof. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
(a) (Based on Ex 8.6) 1 a is a large tetrahedron or a small cube. 2 b is not small. 3 If a is a tetrahedron or a cube, then b is large or small. 4 a is small or b is large. Translation: 1 (Tet(a) Large(a)) (Cube(a) Small(a)) 2 ¬ Small(b) 3 (Tet(a) Cube(a)) (Large(b) Small(b)) 4 Small(a) Large(b) By premise 1, either a is a large tetrahedron or a small cube. Let’s consider each case. Case:
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

section_3.14_answers - PHIL12A Section answers, 14 March...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online