This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: information was taken of employees and directors, like their phone call history, etc, was used only for the investigation purpose of the confidential leaks. It was not used for any other interest or shared with any other person. If the employee is leaking the important confidential information of company to the press then company has a right to find out the leaker by holding any kind of investigation, because the company is paying to employee not only for working with them but also for keeping loyalty towards the company. Otherwise company might never be able reach to the leaker by making investigation with certain limits. On the other hand article also says that the identified leaker George A. Keyworth said that I would have told you all about this. Why didnt you just ask? But it might be possible that Mr. Keyworth has said all that to save himself from guilty. Otherwise he could have told all those things when the investigation was in process....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/20/2011 for the course BBA 101 taught by Professor Avish during the Spring '11 term at Northern Virginia.
- Spring '11