marking_scheme_for_presentations[1]

Marking_scheme_for_p - 1 category content analysis&argument visualskills Oralskills audienceskills timing weight mark 25 25 20 10 10 10 0

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Marking Scheme for Presentations category content visual skills Oral skills audience skills timing weight mark 25% 25% 20% 10% 10% 10% 0%–20% Shows little or  no  understanding  of topic area. No analysis or argument. No  conclusions. Materials missing or used  very badly. Mostly  incomprehensible. Serious problems such as  not facing audience or being  offensive. Panics shortly after  starting and gives up. 20%–35% Weak  description of  background. Little analysis or argument. No  conclusions. Serious failures in design  and use. Mostly hard to hear or  follow. Tends to avoid audience. Far too short.  Completely loses  control. 35%–40% Weak  description of  background.  Little evidence  of work done. Weak analysis. Little argument.  Conclusions weak or absent. Far too many/few slides.  Poor design. Poor choice of  font size style. Hard to hear or follow in 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/20/2011 for the course ACCT 502 taught by Professor Hassanouda during the Spring '11 term at German University in Cairo.

Page1 / 2

Marking_scheme_for_p - 1 category content analysis&argument visualskills Oralskills audienceskills timing weight mark 25 25 20 10 10 10 0

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online