Cambridge_Aerospace_Dictionary.pdf - 978 0...

This preview shows page 1 out of 818 pages.

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 818 pages?

Unformatted text preview: 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 This page intentionally left blank 09:40 Page ii 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page i The Cambridge Aerospace Dictionary Second Edition 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page ii 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page iii The Cambridge Aerospace Dictionary Second Edition Bill Gunston, obe, fraes CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York Information on this title: © Bill Gunston 2004, 2009 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 2009 ISBN-13 978-0-511-63403-1 eBook (EBL) ISBN-13 978-0-521-19165-4 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Information regarding prices, travel timetables, and other factual information given in this work are correct at the time of first printing, but Cambridge University Press does not guarantee the accuracy of such information thereafter. 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page v Foreword Gathering terms for an aerospace dictionary is harder than it looks. I recently studied a list of terms used by the US Air Force to describe the status of each of its component organizations. They explained, ‘These actions are defined in ways that may seem arcane to the nonspecialist, but each term has a specific meaning.’ The terms are: Activate, Active list, Assign, Attach, Consolidate, Constitute, Designate, Disband, Disestablish, Establish, Establishment, Inactivate, Inactive list, Organize, Provisional organizations, Redesignate, Re-establish, Relieve from active duty, and Unit. I read their meanings through several times and decided not to include any in these pages. In a previous edition I was criticised by a reviewer for using words ‘which have no relevance to aerospace’. He cited as an example ‘barrier pattern’, a term which BAe Manchester had asked me to define! My sole objective is to create a useful product. To this end I have included brief entries on such words as ‘generic’, ‘oxygen’ and ‘gasoline’, which are not aerospace terms. Incidentally, while ‘gasoline’ is clearly now a preferred spelling, I have had to write quite an essay on ‘kerosene/ kerosine’. I once had to defend myself against an air marshal who was offended by such rubbish (as he saw it) as ‘hardware’ and ‘software’. Today the explosion of home computing has opened up millions to such previously unfamiliar language. Indeed, in recent years the number of software terms has begun to get out of hand. The JSF programme alone involves more than 40 software acronyms, and I have omitted most of them. Partly for this reason, this dictionary is centred (centered) at least in mid-Atlantic, if not further west, so we have ‘Petrol Gasoline’, the brief definition appearing under the latter. Cross-references are italicised. I have used US spellings wherever they are appropriate, and in this field they tend to predominate. Note: USA means US Army. I have attempted to include a brief explanation of aerospace materials, even if they are known by a registered tradename. Also included are the names of many organizations, but, with a few exceptions, not armed forces, airlines, museums or flying clubs, and certainly not the names of manufacturers or particular types of aircraft, though such acronyms as TSPJ – Tornado self-protection jammer – are tempting. On the other hand, there is a grey area in which a company product appears to merit inclusion, an example being Zero Reader. I have had particular trouble with the names of spacecraft and their payloads, but this is a dictionary of aviation, not space flight. Entries are in strict alphabetical order; thus MW50 appears in the place for MW-fifty. The exception is where an entry has a single alphabetical character followed by a numeral. In such cases it appears immediately after other entries featuring that single character. With a subject as complicated as aerospace, where one finds C, c, c1, c¯ , c¯ , (c), C* and a host of C+numeral entries, it is difficult to decide which sequence to adopt. Greek terms are listed in Appendix 1, but some – such as Alpha and Beta – merit a place in the body of the dictionary. On a lighter note, I read an article by Col. Art Bergman, USAF, explaining how to manage the temperamental F100 engine. I had no difficulty with his EECs, UFCs and Plaps, but I was defeated by ‘The F100 needs a lot more TLC than the J79 . . .’ I asked several certified F-15 drivers, and they were all mystified. I called the 527th TFTS, then the European Aggressor outfit. A charming female voice instantly said, ‘Ever think of tender loving care?’ On reflection, I put this meaning in the dictionary. The criterion is v 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page vi Foreword whether or not an aerospace person might be confused without it. One obvious problem area is at what point one should give up trying to include foreign terms. Some may think I have been overgenerous to our Gallic friends, while other countries may think themselves harshly treated by being ignored. It is impossible to say ‘Leave out all foreign terms and acronyms’, because many have become part of the English language. Nobody would expect ‘aileron’ to be omitted, and before long ‘Fenestron’ will probably be just as universally accepted as ‘fenestron’. At a rough count the number of new entries this time is in excess of 15,000. Almost all the additions are acronyms. There is little point in again saying that acronyms are an infectious disease, especially in the world of aerospace. Whilst admitting that the incentive to abbreviate is often strong, it is self-defeating if the reader has a choice of more than 20 interpretations and does not know which one to pick. Some acronyms, such as Cardsharp, appear contrived. Another is Tiger – Terrifically Insensitive to Ground-Effect Radar; I had to force myself to include it. In general, I have omitted acronyms which include the name of a company, an example being Caps – Collins adaptive processor system. I have attempted to indicate whether the spoken acronym or spelt-out version predominates. Thus, we have Papi before PAPI. The oustanding exception is NATO. This is always spoken as a word, but the hierarchy in Brussels still insists that it is not written Nato. Some acronyms bear little resemblance to the actual initial letters of the original words, while a few are quite a mouthful. We have been in particular trouble with the Joint Strike Fighter. This soon spawned JSF-E&MD and JSFPO-AEP, whilst Boeing was awarded a $28,690,212 contract to perform the JSFPICPTD. This means the Joint Strike Fighter Program Integrated Core Processing Technical Demonstration and is something I have omitted. Another non-starter has to be vi Direct, which the US Air Force tells me stands for Defense IEMATS REplacement Command and Control Terminal, which would be fine were it not for the fact that IEMATS stands for Improved Emergency MEssage Automated Transmission System. Roger Bacon, the sage of Flight International, has drawn attention to Boeing’s ‘no-tail advanced theater transport, tilt-wing super-short takeoff and landing’, which creates the handy name NTATTTW/SSTOL. Clearly, we need acronyms within acronyms. It is often difficult to decide when the name of a specific item has become a more general term which has to be included. In the 1970s the AAH (Advanced Attack Helicopter) meant the AH-64 Apache. This is a particular type of helicopter, so it had no place in these pages. However, over the years AAH has become a term applied to several of the AH-64’s later competitors, so exclusion is no longer justified. In the same way Awacs is now a class of aircraft, while, even though there is only one type of AABNCP, that designation is so important it would be unhelpful to omit it. Both the AAH and AABNCP begin with ‘Advanced’. This is merely a pointless buzzword. Presumably it is intended to imply that something is the very latest, ‘state of the art’ and better than the competition, but – in aerospace at least – I have seldom heard of anybody designing something that was not ‘advanced’. Can these items still be ‘advanced’ after 40 years? To me, another bête noire is ‘integrated’. Already we have a zillion AIAs (advanced integrated acronyms). This is an advanced integrated dictionary. There is an obvious need for a body with the clout to decree what things shall be called, because the present situation is ludicrous. Did you know that the acronym ATAC can mean ‘Advanced Target Acquisition and Classification’? Fine, but ATDC stands for ‘Assisted Target Detection and Classification’ and also for ‘Automatic Target Detection and Classification’ and also for ‘Automated Target Detection and Classification’. Clearly that is not enough, because ATRC stands for 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page vii Foreword ‘Aided Target Recognition and Classification’ and ‘Automatic Target Recognition and Classification’. I did not myself invent these. And I have just noticed that the USAF, the world’s leading offender, has become dissatisfied with the mere ERT (extended-range tank). It has changed it to ERFCS, extendedrange fuel-containment system. Feeble! The name could be made far more complicated! In the same way, it should be simple to have an agreed abbreviation for an airspace control zone, but we are now confronted by CTLZ, CTR, CTRZ, and CTZ. In the first edition of this work I included FMEA, for which two elucidations were (and are) current: failure modes and effects analysis and failure-mode effects analysis. I now have to add FMECA – failure-mode effects and criticality analysis – and FMETA – failure-mode effects and task analysis. It is inconceivable that the authors of the two new letter-jumbles were unaware of FMEA, and I cannot comprehend the need for the two new identities. If we go on like this I fear for the sanity of whoever takes over this work when I collapse through exhaustion. Many of the acronyms in these pages already have more than 20 meanings, and are gathering fresh ones all the time. This trend is leading to texts which, even to most aerospace people, must appear mere gobbledegook. There is no more clearly written periodical than Aerospace, published by the august Royal Aeronautical Society, and it strives to remain one of the few bastions of good English. They published an article which told us, ‘Currently, BASE is developing a Terprom SEM-E standard card for use in the H764G, a high-accuracy INS with embedded GPS. It has two slots, the second being used by an Arinc, MIL-1553A/B or PANIL interface.’ Many readers were doubtless happy with this, and one was impelled to respond with, ‘May I add something to your characterisation of AQP as “an upgrade of CRM” . . . The human factors elements had to be injected into nonjeopardy Loft and LOE . . . With converging developments in CPL NVQ and recurrent CRM, the AQP may be the shape of things to come in the UK.’ A speaker at a recent conference ‘has sat on EUROCONTROL, ICAO, EUROCAE, RTAC and AEEC. In his current position as Programme Manager CNS/ATM he is involved in the CLAIRE and ISATIS using ACARS, a development study of VDL Mode 2 in France. He is evaluation manager of EOLIA and ASD manager in ProATN.’ And an advertisement tells me, ‘Group IV faxes and PCMCIA cards are only supplied with an ISDN S-Bus interface. The ISDN integration provided by the LES means that a SODA is only required at the mobile end.’ I think I need a whisky with my SODA. Preface to the Cambridge edition This updated and enlarged new edition is the first to be published by Cambridge University Press. I would like to thank Phoenix Typesetting for doing a masterful job with mathematics and Greek symbols, and everyone at Cambridge for their diligence and infectious enthusiasm – all too rare these days in book publishing. Bill Gunston, Haslemere, 2004 vii 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - Prelims - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:40 Page viii Foreword to the Second Cambridge Edition I am grateful to the publisher’s excellent team in New York and Cambridge, not least for agreeing that a new edition is needed. The avalanche of new aerospace terms, and especially acronyms, shows no sign of abating. There is little point in my reiterating the questionable value of inventing new meanings for three-letter acronyms when the same three letters already have more than 30 different meanings relevant to aerospace. Of course, common sense shows that these cannot be presented in any particular order of importance. One correspondent asked, ‘What’s the point of having so many meanings for the same set of letters? It just clutters up your book.’ In my reply I asked him which ones he would delete. I am still waiting for his reply. Obviously, it is imposible to include everything. I have given GSP a single brief line, though I have one definition of this seemingly harmless letter-combination which extends over 14 pages of text. My first explanation of EPS is ‘Emergency or [confusing] electrical, power system, or supply, or source’. It was impossible to omit any of these, because all are in current use. The reader can be assured that I am not in the business of myself inventing extra meanings; there are too many already. As far as possible I have (obviously) tried to avoid including an acronym within the explanation of an acronym. I apologise for the fifth translation of Dars. I have offered ‘Deployable ARS12 (NATO).’ The seeker after enlightenment may, in an ill humour, look up ARS12, where he will find it means ‘Air Control Center, recognised air picture production center sensor-fusion post [ACCS] (NATO).’ Quite a mouthful to be represented by three letters. I have tried to keep down the number of viii entries by combining two or more in one entry. For example, under DSU 1 offer: 4 Data-storage unit; R adds receptacle. 5 Defensive system upgrade; P adds program. I hope that no reader seeking DSUR will angrily say that it is not there. I have also agonised over many names and functions, especially in structural analysis where I have often failed to concoct explanations which are both brief and accurate. A dictionary ought not to try to emulate a textbook. Just as this edition was closing for press, I received a letter from Dick Gunnell, an Englishman living in the south of France. He drew my attention to a passage on page 41 of Annette Carson’s classic history of aerobatics Flight Fantastic: At the very same time, quietly and almost unnoticed, it seems, the word “aerobatics” entered the English language. A certain Mr E. L. Gunston wrote the following amusing letter to The Aeroplane, which was published in its edition of 1st January 1914: “Since boucling and boucle is a feat which has come to stay, and which apparently is as common as sane flying, these feats performed by Pégoud, Chevillard and certain other scientific gentlemen will have to be called by a distinguishing name. Why not ‘aerobatics’?” Nice one, Mr Gunston! My correspondent asks whether Mr E.L.G. was my father (‘there appears to be a similarity in the genes’). Regretfully I must claim no known close kinship. I wonder if he invented any other terms now to be found between these covers. Again, I would like to thank Phoenix Typesetting, and everyone concerned at Cambridge University Press, both in Cambridge and New York, for unfailing meticulous attention to detail. Bill Gunston, Haslemere, 2009 978 0 52119 165 4 - 2009 - letter - A - Printer File.qxd 04/05/2009 09:42 Page 1 A A 1 General symbol for area (see S). 2 Aspect ratio (see As). 3 Amperes. 4 Atomic weight. 5 Moment of inertia about longitudinal axis, rolling mode. 6 Anode. 7 Amplitude. 8 Degrees absolute. 9 Amber airway, or light. 10 IFR flight plan suffix, fitted DME and 4096-code. 11 JETDS code: piloted aircraft, IR or UV radiation. 12 Airborne Forces category aircraft (UK, 1944–46). 13 Atomic (as in A-bomb). 14 Sonobuoy standard size class, c 1 m/3 ft. 15 Air Branch (UK Admiralty). 16 Calibration (USAF role prefix 1948–62). 17 US military aircraft basic mission or modified mission: attack (USAS, USAAC, USAAF, 1924–48; USN 1948–62; USAF/USN since 1962). 18 Aircraft category, ambulance (USAAS 1919–24, USN 1943). 19 Powered target (USAAC 1940–41). 20 Amphibian (USAF 1948–55). 21 Availability. 22 Aeroplane (PPL). 23 Altitude, followed by digits indicating hundreds of feet. 24 Arm, as distinct from safe. 25 Antarctic (but Tor Bergeron’s classification = Arctic). 26 Alternate [airport]. 27 Weather: hail 28 Accepted (EFIS or nav. display). 29 Arrival chart. 30 Sport-parachuting certificate: 10 jumps, no accuracy demanded. 31 Autotuned (navaid). 32 Magnetic-vector potential. 33 Aircraft category: free balloon (FAI). 34 Cross-section area of wing torsion box. 35 Common but not universal usage for aft-acting aerodynamic force; not synonymous with drag but the x-axis component of Fa. 36 Margin [e.g., 0.15 or 0.2] above stall speed. ¯ Structural resistance to buckling. A Ã Wing-section axial force parallel to chord, per unit span. Å Angström (10 –10m), very small unit of length, contrary to SI. (A) Local time. a 1 Velocity of sound in any medium. 2 Structural cross-section area. 3 Anode. 4 (Prefix) atto, = × 10–18. 5 (Suffix) available (thus, LD a = landing distance available). 6 Ambient. 7 Acceleration. a- Average value of lift-curve slope due to angle of attack. ã Kussner factor. A0, A0 Unmodulated (steady note) CW radio emission. A0A1 Unmodulated (steady note) radio emission identified by Morse coding in a break period. A0A2 Unmodulated emission identified by Morse coding heard above unbroken carrier (eg an NDB). A1, A 1 1 Unmodulated but keyed radio emission, typically giving Morse dots and dashes. 2 Flying instructor category; two years and 400 h as instructor (British Commonwealth air forces). a1 Lift-curve slope for wing or other primary aerodynamic surface, numerically equal to dCL/dα. A2 Military flying instructor category; 15 months and 250 h. a2 Lift-curve slope for hinged trailing-edge control surface [arguably, also flap], numerically dCL/d⑀. A2C 2 Army airborne [or airspace] command and control [S adds system] (USA). A2C2 Airborne airstrike command and control (GTACS); S adds system. A2IPB Automated assistance with intelligence preparation of the battlespace (USAF). A3 AM radio transmission with double SB. A3 Affordable acquisition approach (USAF). A3H AM, SSB transmission with full carrier. A3I Army/NASA aircrew/aircraft integration (USA/US). A3J AM, SSB transmission with suppressed carrier. A3M Advanced air-to-air missiles. A3TC Advanced automated air traffic control. A8-20 Airworthiness approval for classic (usually ex-military) aircraft (CAA, UK). A-25 Royal Navy form for reporting aircraft accidents. A400 to A755 See Arinc, ARINC. A-battery Electric cell to heat cathode filament in valve (tube). A-bomb Atomic bomb, see nuclear weapon. A-check S-check plus routine inspection of flightcontrol system. For a modern airline engine, typically 750 h. A-class 1 Airspace = 18,000+ ft [5486 m] AMSL and controlled. 2 Aircraft accident = involving loss of life or damage exceeding US$1 million. A-frame hook Aircraft arrest...
View Full Document

  • Fall '19

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes