{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

case - WHAT Loudermill on the job application states e...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
WHAT: Loudermill on the job application states e never been convicted of a felony. Giving a false statement he had been convicted of grand larceny then was discharge for dishonest. Loudermill filed iin federal district ct claiming ohio statue was unconstitutional because it provided no opportunity for a discharge employee to respond w/o due process also discharge employees not givien postremoval hearings Distract ct case dismiss case failure to state of claim (not recognizable by law) loudermill was afforded due process SO:Due process clause gives individual on opportunity for a hearing before he is deprives of any property interest. Requires some kind of hearing prior of an employee, also hearing at a meaningful of time and meaningful manner - everyone is not entitled to a hearing due process according to the constitution. BUT only tenured employees have a property interest. - If loudermill had obtained his employment by lying on application argues
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}