This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 2. Strategy skew. a. Both debaters should have a reasonable expectation of understanding how the arguments in the round will interact, i.e. under what conditions a counter-plan may be kicked. Even if the negative specified those conditions, they ought be rejected as they skew my ability to run the arguments that I want because I dont know if I will win the theory argument that will take out the counter-plan. b. Strategy skew is key to fairness as each side is able to run arguments that can predictably win them the round, otherwise all of one sides arguments could become irrelevant. It is also key to education as the only way to check back, minus theory, is to simply not make arguments that are likely to become irrelevant. Doing so would deny the debaters exposure to the educational value of these arguments....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/21/2011 for the course ECONOMICS 302 taught by Professor Wayne during the Spring '11 term at Wayne State University.
- Spring '11