T Dispositional CPs Good - Palo Alto LC A Counter...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Palo Alto LC A. Counter Interpretation: I can run dispositional counterplans as long as I specify the conditions he has to meet. You prefer a dispositional counterplan over a conditional or unconditional plan because a dispositional plan provides a brightline for when its permissible to kick the plan compared to conditional plans, and it allows for reciprocal burdens compared to unconditional plans. B. I run a dispositional counterplan. C. Standards 1. Ground. Running dispositional counterplans allow for a fair allotment of ground because the AC still has the ability to generate disads, put defense on, and weigh against the CP. The AC could also prove why it’s not competitive. This solves back for unique ground given to the AC like a permutation, while allowing the NC to still advocate the counterplan. Rejecting dispositional plans is uneducational and unfair; introducing alternatives is educational because we learn about different ways to do the same action, and debating under even ground is
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

T Dispositional CPs Good - Palo Alto LC A Counter...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online