barbri_outline_-_ny_(2005)_-_conflict_of_laws - Conflict of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Conflict of Laws 1 C ONFLICT OF L AWS I. Introduction A. Judgments – another state/nation is the source of a judgment. Winner of that judgment wishes to have the judgment recognized and enforced by NY Courts, which will be the forum for the enforcement action B. Choice of Laws – litigation filed in NY and the NY court must decide whether to apply NY law to the controversy or some other state’s/country’s law. II. Judgments A. Recognition of Sister State Judgments 1. Under US Constitution, Fed & NY statute – NY must recognize and enforce judgment issues by sister state a. Recognition – obligation to covert sister state judgment into NY judgment b. Enforcement – obligation of NY to use whatever mechanism to enforcement that judgment 2. Defenses to recognition and enforcement a. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction in state where judgment was awarded – best defense if applicable; if State X’s judgment was default judgment (D didn’t appear to defend case in State X), D may challenge State X’s jurisdiction over him when default judgment is brought to NY for recognition & enforcement (i) If NY court decides State X had jurisdiction over B – NY will recognize and enforce the judgment unless one of the other exceptions applies (ii) If NY court decides State X NOT have jurisdiction over B – NY will declare State X’s judgment void (State X’s judgment cannot be enforced against D) b. NY may deny/limit recognition of a State X judgment if State X itself would deny/limit the effect of its judgment – NY will look to see whether other state has enforced it. 3. Invalid Defenses a. Mistake of Law or Fact – even though mistake of law or fact in proceeding before State X, NY must still recognize the outcome of the State X proceeding (e.g. the forum to fix is on appeal in State X) b. Public Policy (i) General Rule – NY will recognize and enforce judgment even though underlying determinant violates public policy (ii) Cautionary Note – this is a losing argument ( contrast with following public policy argument for foreign country judgments) B. Recognition of Foreign Country Judgments 1. Comity – respect (overarching stand) 2. No Constitutional Obligation – governed by statute (presumption that NY will recognize & enforce) 3. Mandatory Non-Recognition a. NO personal jurisdiction over the D in the foreign country; b. D did NOT have full and fair opportunity to defend 4. Discretionary Non-Recognition : a. Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction in foreign country (discretionary matter) b. Country X was a serious inconvenient venue for the D c. P agreed to resolve the dispute somewhere other than in the courts of Country X (e.g. arbitration) d. Judgment violates the strong public policy of NY – NY can refuse recognition III. Choice of Law A. Domicile 1. Basic Principle – every person has a domicile (domicile may occur by operation of law or by choice) 2. Types of Domicile : a. Domicile of Origin (by operation of law) – domicile at birth...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/22/2011 for the course LAW LAW taught by Professor Concordia during the Spring '11 term at Concordia AB.

Page1 / 5

barbri_outline_-_ny_(2005)_-_conflict_of_laws - Conflict of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online