Ch+14-REVIEW-Agreemt-S10

Ch+14-REVIEW-Agreemt-S10 - Ch. 14Agreement REVIEW Dr....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ch. 14—Agreement Dr. Deborah Pomeroy REVIEW BLaw 2361—S10 AGREEMENT Remember from Ch 13, Agreement is the FIRST ELEMENT of a valid K --An agreement requires an OFFER from an Offeror (O’or) and an ACCEPTANCE of the offer by the Offeree (O’ee). --The parties must manifest their agreement to the same bargain , i.e., there must be a “ meeting of the minds .” Once AGREEMENT is reached, if the other elements of a K are present (consideration, capacity, and legality), a valid K is formed. REQUIREMENTS (ELEMENTS) OF THE OFFER (1)-The O’or must seriously, and objectively, intend to perform or refrain as offered. (2)-The offer must include all material terms of a K and must be reasonably certain or definite . (3)-The O’or must communicate the offer to the offeree. I. INTENT --O’or must OBJECTIVELY MANIFEST an intent to be bound to the terms of the offer by the O’or’s acceptance(SEE “Objective Theory of Contracts”—Ch. 13). --Remember, Ks are interpreted using an “ OBJECTIVE ” standard, which means that courts are concerned w/parties’ outward manifestations of intent , not their internal thought processes. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
--Obviously, if TARP would clearly interpret a party as joking or speaking in anger, or sarcastically, etc, then TARP would NOT interpret the words as a SERIOUS offer. --sometimes an O’or may try to avoid being bound by a K later by claiming the offer (s)he made was actually a joke/or that (s(he was too intoxicated to know what (s)he was doing--BUT, even if the person was joking/intoxicated, it MUST BE clear to an objective, reasonable person, observing the party’s words and actions that was the case. LUCY V. ZEHMER , Virginia (1954). Classic case re objective theory of Ks. (see notes) Ct said: We must look to the outward expression of a person as manifesting his intention rather than to his secret and unexpressed intention. The law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.” The following are NOT OFFERS : PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS: --An “invitation to negotiate” or an “expression of possible interest” is NOT an offer b/c there is no expressed willingness to be bound, ONLY a willingness to discuss the possibility of entering into a K. BIDS:
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 7

Ch+14-REVIEW-Agreemt-S10 - Ch. 14Agreement REVIEW Dr....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online