emlectures2 - 8 Lorentz Invariance and Special Relativity...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 8 Lorentz Invariance and Special Relativity The principle of special relativity is the assertion that all laws of physics take the same form as described by two observers moving with respect to each other at constant velocity v . If the dynamical equations for a system preserve their form under such a change of coordinates, then they must show a corresponding symmetry. Newtonian mechanics satisfied this principle in the form of Galilei relativity, for which the relation between the coordinates was simply r ′ ( t ) = r ( t ) − v t , and for which time in the two frames was identical. However, Maxwell’s field equations do not preserve their form under this change of coordinates, but rather under a modified transformation: the Lorentz transformations. 8.1 Space-time symmetries of the wave equation Let us first study the space-time symmetries of the wave equation for a field component in the absence of sources: − parenleftbigg ∇ 2 − 1 c 2 ∂ 2 ∂t 2 parenrightbigg ψ = 0 (404) As we discussed last semester spatial rotations x ′ k = R kl x l are realized by the field transfor- mation ψ ′ ( x ′ ,t ) = ψ ( x ,t ) = ψ ( R − 1 x ′ ,t ). Then ∇ ′ k ψ ′ = R − 1 lk ∇ l ψ = R kl ∇ l ψ , and the wave equation is invariant under rotations because ∇ 2 is a rotational scalar. If we have set up a fixed Cartesian coordinate system we may build up any rotation by a sequence of rotations about any of the three axes. Instead of specifying the axis of one of these basic rotations, it is more convenient to specify the plane in which the coordinate axes rotate. For example, we describe a rotation by angle θ about the z-axis as a rotation in the xy-plane. ∇ ′ x = cos θ ∇ x − sin θ ∇ y , ∇ ′ y = sin θ ∇ x + cos θ ∇ y . (405) Then it is easy to see from the properties of trig functions that ∇ ′ 2 x + ∇ ′ 2 y + ∇ ′ 2 z = ∇ 2 x + ∇ 2 y + ∇ 2 z , (406) under a rotation in any of the three planes, and through composition under any spatial rotation. There must be a similar symmetry in the xt-, yt-, and zt-planes. But because of the relative minus sign we have to use hyperbolic trig functions instead of trig functions: ∇ ′ x = cosh λ ∇ x + sinh λ ∂ c∂t , ∂ c∂t ′ = + sinh λ ∇ x + cosh λ ∂ c∂t (407) The invariance of ∇ 2 x − ∂ 2 /c 2 ∂t 2 under this transformation then follows. Clearly there are analogous symmetries in the yt- and zt-planes. These transformations will replace the Galilei boosts of Newtonian relativity. 82 c circlecopyrt 2010 by Charles Thorn Now let us interpret this symmetry in terms of how the coordinates transform: x ′ = x cosh λ − ct sinh λ ≡ γ ( x − vt ) (408) ct ′ = ct cosh λ − x sinh λ ≡ γ ( ct − vx/c ) (409) where v = c tanh λ . From the identity cosh − 2 = 1 − tanh 2 , we see that γ ≡ cosh λ = 1 / radicalbig 1 − v 2 /c 2 . We see from the first equation that the origin of the primed coordinate system x ′ = 0 corresponds to...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/25/2011 for the course PHY 6346 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at University of Florida.

Page1 / 80

emlectures2 - 8 Lorentz Invariance and Special Relativity...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online