3555_Fiedler_PathGoal

3555_Fiedler_PathGoal - Click to edit Master subtitle style...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Click to edit Master subtitle style 9/25/11 Quiz News Fiedlers Contingency Theory Path Goal Theory Team discussion of case example 9/25/11 Fiedlers Contingency Theory of Leadership: Situational Factors Fred E. Fiedler { 1 E 1 4 A 5 C B -2 E 4 -4 B 1 7 -8 5 2 0 -5 1 E C 3 D 3 E D 2 } Task structure { F 8 7 0 9 B D 3 -0 A 9 1 -4 F 8 B -9 C 4 6 -6 F 8 4 3 6 0 E 4 C 5 4 } Goal clarity { A 1 E 9 B 3 F -C 1 B 4 -4 E C -9 2 4 6 -4 2 E 1 A B D F 3 C D 3 } Position power { 5 0 D F 7 D 0 C -0 A 5 C -4 6 4 D -9 3 A 7 -7 2 8 C F 2 3 4 A 8 A 3 } Direct/recommend action { 9 6 3 1 C 1 2 -C 4 B -4 7 8 D -8 E 7 E -B E 0 4 D 0 C 2 0 5 A } Conduct performance evaluation { F 4 6 5 A 4-5 E 0 -4 B 2 -A 2 6-D 8 B 7 1 8 3 1 2 E 7 } Leader-member relations er cooperation/conflict { F 9 B 7 5 2 7 2 -7 9 A B -4 C D 8 -B E C -E 8 6 3 A 7 F E D 3 6 A } Path simplicity/multiplicity { B 8 7 9 5 A 8 5 -1 B E F -4 D 8-8 4 A 6 -B A 1 B 0 4 3 5 6 7 C } Solution singularity/multiplicity Solution verifiability { F 2 D 6 7 D 9 6 -7 4 D A -4 7 D D -A 7 5 9 -4 E C B E D 9 A 3 7 E } Affect promotion/demotion, hire/fire { F E 7 3 E 2 E 7 -5 D E 3 -4 9 B 4 -9 A E 6 -5 6 B 6 5 4 9 A 5 6 F 9 } Leader expertise/knowledge { F D 1 3 7 8 C F -3 8 C-4 7 A 4 -8 1 A D -6 4 E 9 3 D F 4 E 5 8 0 } Formal title { F 4 9 E D 6 7 C -2 B 5 -4 5 B 6 -9 F 9 5 -0 5 F 1 6 C 9 0 2 9 0 8 } Appointed by authority lity, trustworthiness { 3 C 1 5 4 2 C D -A F D B -4 5 C -B 5 F 8 -6 B 6 A B 3 D 6 1 7 4 6 } Harmonious climate rker cooperation/conflict iative by workers 9/25/11 Pleasant Friendly Rejecting Tense Distant Cold Supportive Boring Quarrelso me Gloomy Open Backbiting Untrustwor thy Considerat e Unpleasant Unfriendly Accepting Relaxed Close Warm Hostile Interesting Harmonio us Cheerful Guarded Loyal Trustworth y Inconsider ate 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Least Preferred Co-Worker Scale Scoring >72 Relationship 65-71 Mixed <64 Task 9/25/11...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/25/2011 for the course BSAD 375 taught by Professor Hamilton during the Spring '10 term at SUNY Canton.

Page1 / 21

3555_Fiedler_PathGoal - Click to edit Master subtitle style...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online