This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: ere are many. But only occasionally does one find a man
who organizes his life efforts to be beautiful, who establishes criteria of success or failure on complexion,
hair, features of face and lines of figure. So long, therefore, as woman can obtain power through beauty and
sex appeal, so long may we expect a trivial trend in her character.
We have lost track of our hypothetical child in the history of his character development, lost sight of him as he
struggles in a morass of desires and purposes of power, fellowship and superiority. His situations become still
more complex as we watch him seek to unify his life around permanent purposes, against a pestering, surging,
recurring, temporary desire. He desires, let us say, to conform to the restriction in sex, but as he approaches
adolescence, within and without stimuli of breathless ardor assail him. He must inhibit them if he proposes to
be chaste, and his continent road is beset with never-resting temptations. He calls himself a fool at times for
resisting, and his mind pictures the delights he misses--if not from direct experience, from information he
gathers in books and from those who know--and if he yields, then self-reproach embitters him. But correctly
to portray the situation is to drop our hypothetical adolescent, for here is where individual reaction and
individual situations are too varied to be met with in one case. Some do not inhibit their sex desires at all;
others resist now and then, others yield occasionally; still others remain faithful to the ideal. Some drop the
conventional ideal and replace with unconventional substitutes, some resist at great cost to themselves, and
others find no difficulty in resisting what is no temptation at all to them. Passion, resistance, opportunity,
training and sublimation differ as remarkably as nuns differ from prostitutes.
A similar situation is found in the work purposes. To work steadily, with industry and unflagging effort, at
something perhaps not inherently attractive is not merely a measure of energy,--it is a measure of inhibition
View Full Document
- Spring '11