DQ 1 & 2 - What are key differences between the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
What are key differences between the ontological, teleological, and cosmological arguments? Identify the philosopher who you think best supports his or her argument. There are a few different arguments when it comes to the existence of a higher power. The cosmological argument of the existence of a high power pretty much states that everything that begins to exist has a cause of existence. The teleological argument states that some products on Earth and the universe cannot be made by natural design, so there for, must have been designed by an intelligent source. The ontological argument is arguments from nothing but analytic, a priori and necessary premises to the conclusion that God exists. I feel that Kalam supports the cosmological argument very well. Kalam argues that since everything that begins to exist has a cause of existence. The universe began to exist so the universe has a cause of existence. If something has a finite past, its existence has a cause, so therefore the universe has a finite past so the universe has a cause of existence.   What are key differences between the ontological, teleological, and cosmological
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

DQ 1 & 2 - What are key differences between the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online