Law of Torts II CASES – Economic Loss (Lecture 10)

Law of Torts II CASES – Economic Loss (Lecture 10)

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Law of Torts II CASES – Economic Loss (Lecture 10) Negligent misstatements: FACTS: o P were advertising agents, placing ads in newspapers. They paid for ads themselves on the basis that they would be reimbursed. o D replied that Easipower “were quite good for its engagements”. However, stated that this recommendation was given “without responsibility”. o Easipower failed to reimburse P and went into liquidation, resulting in P suing D alleging that their economic loss was caused by D’s negligence. HELD: o D’s were not liable as credit reference had been given “without responsibility”. Therefore, there was a disclaimer. o However, obiter statements and that the Ds would have been liable in negligence in absence of this statement. o It was also held by Lord Reid that there has to be more than just a misstatement, as it is not enough to establish a DOC. o
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/27/2011 for the course FINANCE 1001 taught by Professor Profassorted during the Three '11 term at University of Adelaide.

Page1 / 3

Law of Torts II CASES – Economic Loss (Lecture 10)

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online