phil5w10_Lecture_Mar11

phil5w10_Lecture_Mar11 - William Hawk, Pacifism: Reclaiming...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
William Hawk, “Pacifism: Reclaiming the Moral Presumption” Argues that “the pacifist way of life” includes many humanitarian, life-affirming, and other morally responsible activities as well as the rejection of war as morally unjustified Claims that “the pacifist moral vision” has as constitutive elements two theses: War is egregiously morally bad, and Intentionally killing human beings against their will is morally wrong because human life is ultimately valuable (sacred) or inviolable Relates these two theses to two types of pacifism 1. Anti-warist pacifism, and 2. Personal pacifism Argues that 2, which usually triggers more objections than 1, can be defended on both moral and epistemic grounds Just war and morally permissible killing of the unwilling are open questions
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The Open Questions Both questions concern what is (is not) morally permissible: 1. Is war morally wrong or can there be a just war ? 2.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/28/2011 for the course PHILOSOPHY 100 taught by Professor None during the Fall '11 term at UC Irvine.

Page1 / 4

phil5w10_Lecture_Mar11 - William Hawk, Pacifism: Reclaiming...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online