Lecture 20 - Rewriting Van der Waals Eqn. of State kT 2 av...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Rewriting Van der Waals Eqn. of State 32 v v v 0 kT a ab b P P P    (1) For c TT 3 solutions 1 2 3 (v , v , v ) for fixed P, T c 3 solutions coalesce at vv c i.e. for , CC P P T T  LHS of Eqn. (1) is   3 C But   3 3 2 2 3 v- v v -3v v 3v v- v c c c c  (2) Comparing (1) and (2) From (iii) and (ii) dividing Then 2 and 3 3 ( ) 3 3 3 ( ) 27 27 8 () 27 c c c c c cc c c c c kT bi b v b P a ab a v ii P P bb ab a v iii T P bk  Define reduced variables / / / c c c P P P T T T   Universal from   1 2 8 3 1 3 (3) PT  Law of Corresponding States
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Figure Caption: The liquid gas coexistence curves of many fluids can be virtually superimposed when the temperature and density are scaled by their corresponding critical values c T and c . Plots of this kind are manifestations of the “law of corresponding states”. This plot from Guggenheim (1945) played an important role in the development of the theory of critical phenomena by showing that the data cannot be fitted with a quadratic curves van der Waals theory implies, but require the cubic shown here, which corresponds to the fact that the order-parameter exponent 1/ 3 and not 1/2 as van der Waals theory implies.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 6

Lecture 20 - Rewriting Van der Waals Eqn. of State kT 2 av...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online