{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Bio 201 F11 Lect 8 (True) v2nr

Bio 201 F11 Lect 8 (True) v2nr - Biology in the News[see...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Biology in the News [see folder on BB] •  •  •  •  •  •  ants have evolved social behavior ("eusociality") mul=ple =mes independently a recent effort has begun to sequence the genomes of several ant species to try to uncover the evolu=onary gene=c basis of the evolu=on of eusociality some of the most important features of the eusociality of ants, bees, and termites are differen=a=on of roles (castes) within the hive (queen, drone, worker, etc.) as well as the ability to communicate informa=on between individual members (e.g. when bees do a dance to indicate to other bees the direc=on of nectar sources) red harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) ‐ have more genes associated with smell (olfactory genes) than other insect genomes; consistent with ants using chemical communica=on genes encoding components of the immune system are very different from other insects ‐ possibly rela=ng to the need for crowded hives to fight disease outbreaks it has also been found that genes regula=ng the development of wings and ovaries in ants show differences from other insects possibly rela=ng to their need to be expressed differently between the different castes hHp://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp? cntn_id=118398&WT.mc_id=USNSF_51&WT.mc_ev=click hHp://www.discoverlife.org/IM/I_ANT/0001/320/ Pogonomyrmex_barbatus,_worker,I_ANT123.jpg varia=on at the protein and DNA sequence level •  in the 1960s‐1980s it became apparent that molecular varia=on within popula=ons and species was very, very common •  The idea that natural selec=on might have liHle or no effect on this varia=on came from the above observa=on –  this varia=on could mostly be “adap=vely neutral” •  many amino acid subs=tu=ons might be func=onally equivalent –  don’t change the charge or shape of a protein domain •  very many DNA nucleo=de subs=tu=ons might be selec=vely neutral –  noncoding regions –  synonymous subs=tu=ons in coding regions Evolu=on of neutral muta=ons (correc&on in green boldface) •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  Motoo Kimura in 1968 proposed that most molecular varia=on in natural popula=ons is neutral: Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolu&on Selec=on has no effect on this varia=on; evolu=on is by gene&c dri: ‐ Recall “boHlenecks” and other examples from previous lecture Muta=on rate: µ In diploids: # gene copies =2N (N= popula=on size) Average number of new muta=ons each genera=on: =µ•2N Probability that each new neutral muta=on will increase to 100% = its frequency =1/2N Overall frequency of new muta=ons increasing to 100% =µ•2N * 1/2N = µ , the muta=on rate (popula=on size doesn’t maHer) •  Larger popula=ons have more muta=ons than smaller popula=ons •  Smaller popula=ons have fewer muta=ons but each one is more likely to go to 100% than in a larger popula=on Constancy of neutral muta=ons going to 100% (fixa=on) leads to the idea of a molecular clock –  Can use molecular data to es=mate the =me two species have been diverging Selec=on at the molecular level •  Recall two types of selec=on from previous lecture –  Posi=ve (direc=onal) and stabilizing •  Neutral evolu=on –  Rate of synonymous subs=tu=on approx. = rate of nonsynonymous subs=tu=on •  Stabilizing selec=on (selec=on for no change) –  Rate of synonymous subs=tu=on > rate of nonsynonymous subs=tu=on •  Posi=ve (direc=onal) selec=on (selec=on promotes change in amino acid sequence) –  Rate of synonymous subs=tu=on << rate of nonsynonymous subs=tu=on Evolu=on of foregut fermenta=on •  Posterior esophagous or stomach modified to hold bacteria, which digest plant maHer (cellulose) via fermenta=on •  Evolved independently in primates (langurs) and ruminants (caHle) •  Also evolved independently in one lineage of birds (hoatzin) Molecular evolu=on of lysozyme in foregut fermenters •  •  Most animals, defensive enzyme (digests bacterial cell walls) In foregut fermenters, modifica=ons of lysozyme have evolved –  Enables some foregut bacteria to release nutrients, which are absorbed as food • 5 amino acid changes have evolved independently in both langurs and caHle • Some of these have also evolved in hoatzins Varia=on in gene number among species •  Why? –  Complexity –  Other reasons? –  What about coding vs. noncoding DNA? Varia=on in the amount of noncoding DNA •  Why? –  Differing rates of loss of nonfunc=onal DNA –  Rela=onship between DNA content and reproduc=ve rate genomes have a lot of genes •  where do they come from? •  new genes are only very rarely “invented” –  could be from purng together pieces of previously exis=ng genes •  many genes arise from duplica=on and diversifica=on of pre‐exis=ng genes –  gene families hHp://www.pnas.org/content/98/19/10763/F1.large.jpg Gene duplica=on 1 specia=on 1 1 Gene duplica=on SPECIES 1 Ancestral copy 2 1a 2 SPECIES 2 • Genes 1 and 1a are paralogs of each other (paralogous) • Genes 1 and 2 are orthologs (orthologous) • Genes 1a and 2 are orthologs (orthologous) • All 3 genes are homologous to each other (less specific term) Evolu=on of gene families (#s are es=mated # of DNA sequence changes) What is a phylogeny? •  Also called a phylogene&c tree •  Illustrates the hypothesized rela=onships among a set of taxa (singular = taxon) More recent !me ancient ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online