CT_Scans_LATimes_09_08(2009030423450915) -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-ctscan7-2008sep07,0,5239630,full.story   CT scans can be better medicine for doctors than for patients They provide detailed views of internal organs, but the price is increased doses of radiation. By Alan Zarembo, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer September 7, 2008 When Maureen Scanlan had a painful kidney stone episode four years ago, she was pleased that her doctor ordered an annual regimen of CT scans to monitor her condition. The scans involved hundreds of razor-thin X-rays of her innards stitched together by a computer into stunningly detailed 3-D images showing the size and location of the stone, down to the millimeter. Related Content Anatomy of a CT scan (click the link or read the diagram and table after the article) What she didn't realize was that the perfection of the images was a result of a radiation dose equivalent to more than a dozen standard abdominal X-rays -- all for a condition that though painful is relatively mundane. "I never thought twice about it," said the 38-year-old mother of two from Westfield, N.J., who since learning of the radiation has been worried that the scans may have played a role in two miscarriages. "I knew there was radiation, but I didn't realize how strong it was." Scanlan is part of an explosion in the use of one of the most revolutionary medical technologies of the last half century. Introduced in the 1970s, computed tomography scans have become a standard procedure for such common problems as kidney stones, persistent headaches and appendicitis. Doctors in the U.S. ordered 68.7 million CT scans last year, more than triple the number in 1995, according to IMV Medical Information Division, a medical market research group in Des Plaines, Ill. Generating tens of billions of dollars in billing each year, CT scanning has become an economic engine for hospitals and doctors, and the once-exotic million-dollar devices are starting to be found in private practices. "It's gotten into the culture of doctors," said Geoffrey Rubin, a Stanford University radiologist. But with the boom has come a rising concern that the abundant use of radiation is beginning to have a subtle effect on the health of the nation. Although the risk of a single CT scan to an individual is minuscule, even a tiny increase in radiation exposure spread over a large population can eventually add up to tens of thousands of cancer deaths a year. A controversial study published last November in the New England Journal of Medicine estimated that CT scans administered today could cause up to 2% of cancer deaths in two or three decades. The doctors who have embraced the technology in increasing numbers say the small increased risk is a minor price for a snapshot of the body so detailed it can delineate hidden infections of the sinuses, tiny blood clots in the lungs and thin layers of plaque on heart vessels.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/29/2011 for the course BIO 020.152 taught by Professor Pearlman during the Fall '08 term at Johns Hopkins.

Page1 / 6

CT_Scans_LATimes_09_08(2009030423450915) -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online