CH06_ERGODIC - Chapter 6 Ergodicity and the Approach to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 6 Ergodicity and the Approach to Equilibrium 6.1 Equilibrium Recall that a thermodynamic system is one containing an enormously large number of constituent particles, a typical large number being Avogadros number, N A = 6 . 02 10 23 . Nevertheless, in equilibrium , such a system is characterized by a relatively small number of thermodynamic state variables. Thus, while a complete description of a (classical) system would require us to account for O ( 10 23 ) evolving degrees of freedom, with respect to the physical quantities in which we are interested, the details of the initial conditions are effectively forgotten over some microscopic time scale , called the collision time, and over some microscopic distance scale, , called the mean free path 1 . The equilibrium state is time-independent. 6.2 The Master Equation Relaxation to equilibrium is often modeled with something called the master equation . Let P i ( t ) be the probability that the system is in a quantum or classical state i at time t . Then write dP i dt = summationdisplay j ( W ji P j W ij P i ) . (6.1) Here, W ij is the rate at which i makes a transition to j . Note that we can write this equation as dP i dt = summationdisplay j ij P j , (6.2) 1 Exceptions involve quantities which are conserved by collisions, such as overall particle number, mo- mentum, and energy. These quantities relax to equilibrium in a special way called hydrodynamics . 1 2 CHAPTER 6. ERGODICITY AND THE APPROACH TO EQUILIBRIUM where ij = braceleftBigg W ji if i negationslash = j k W jk if i = j , (6.3) where the prime on the sum indicates that k = j is to be excluded. The constraints on the W ij are that W ij 0 for all i,j , and we may take W ii 0 (no sum on i ). Fermis Golden Rule of quantum mechanics says that W ji = 2 planckover2pi1 vextendsingle vextendsingle ( i | V | j ) vextendsingle vextendsingle 2 ( E i ) , (6.4) where H vextendsingle vextendsingle i )big = E i vextendsingle vextendsingle i )big , V is an additional potential which leads to transitions, and ( E i ) is the density of final states at energy E i . If the transition rates W ij are themselves time-independent, then we may formally write P i ( t ) = ( e t ) ij P j (0) . (6.5) Here we have used the Einstein summation convention in which repeated indices are summed over (in this case, the j index). Note that summationdisplay i ij = 0 , (6.6) which says that the total probability i P i is conserved: d dt summationdisplay i P i = summationdisplay i,j ij P j = summationdisplay j parenleftBig summationdisplay i ij parenrightBig P j = 0 . (6.7) Suppose we have a time-independent solution to the master equation, P eq i . Then we must have ij P eq j = 0 = P eq j W ji = P eq i W ij . (6.8) This is called the condition of detailed balance . Assuming W ij negationslash = 0 and P eq j = 0, we can divide to obtain W ji W ij = P eq i P eq...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2011 for the course PHYS 221a taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 24

CH06_ERGODIC - Chapter 6 Ergodicity and the Approach to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online