This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: This law differs from the Civil Rights Act of 1875 in that it is limited to “enterprises having a direct and substantial relation to the interstate flow of goods and people.” Because the development of commerce has increased the volume and changed the flow of goods, putting an increased importance on travel, inhibiting travel today would but a much larger negative impact on the nation’s economy than in the past. According to United States v. Darby, Congress has the power to not only regulate commerce, but also those activities intrastate that affect interstate commerce....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 10/03/2011 for the course POL 142 taught by Professor Jones during the Fall '08 term at Miami University.
- Fall '08