FLETCHER - Ralph FLETCHER and D'Ann Fletcher, Appellants,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ralph FLETCHER and D'Ann Fletcher, Appellants, v. John R. EDWARDS, et al., Appellees. No. 10-98-226-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. March 29, 2000. Purchasers of lot brought action against real estate agents and real estate agency alleging statutory and common law fraudulent inducement, violations of Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), and negligent misrepresentation. The 249th Judicial District Court, Johnson County, granted summary judgment for agents and agency. The Court of Appeals, Davis, C.J., held that: (1) clause in earnest money contract for sale of lot, under which purchasers contractually bound themselves to accept property in its present condition, was agreement to purchase property "as is;" (2) real estate agency and agents, as agents of vendor of lot, could rely on purchase agreement and acceptance of title as defense to misrepresentation claims, since both documents indicated that purchasers would accept lot "as is;" (3) genuine issue of material fact as to whether purchasers were fraudulently induced into entering into purchase agreement and acceptance of title existed, which precluded summary judgment on statutory and common law fraudulent inducement claims; (4) question of agent's knowledge as to falsity of representations did not wholly dispose of common law fraud claim, since purchasers could also prevail if they showed that agent recklessly made alleged representations as positive assertions without knowledge of truth; and (5) genuine issue of material fact as to whether real estate agent acted recklessly when he told purchasers of lot that water was available on lot existed, which precluded summary judgment on common law fraudulent inducement claim. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part. BEFORE: Chief Justice DAVIS, Justice VANCE, and Justice GRAY. OPINION DAVIS, Chief J. > [1] Ralph and D'Ann Fletcher filed suit against John R. Edwards, Rob Orr, ERA Orr & Associates (collectively, "Appellees") and others alleging statutory and common law fraudulent inducement, DTPA violations, and negligent misrepresentation. The Fletchers allege that Edwards, a real estate agent, represented to them that they could get a water connection to a lot which they ultimately purchased, when in fact they could not obtain the necessary connection because of a lack of easements across an adjoining lot. The court granted a summary judgment in Appellees' favor. The Fletchers present the following ten issues in this appeal: · were the "as is" clauses in the documents they signed with the seller Donald L. Wallace a part of the bargain between Wallace and themselves; · if so, did these clauses "survive the June 5, 1991 closing at the title company"; · are Orr and ERA jointly and severally liable for Edwards's alleged representations concerning the availability of water to the property the Fletchers purchased; · was Appellees' First Amended Original Answer and Original Counter-Claim for Declaratory Judgment filed and served in time to become part of the summary judgment record;
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 9

FLETCHER - Ralph FLETCHER and D'Ann Fletcher, Appellants,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online