Physics ee

In survey essays the weaker candidates relied too

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: re able to demonstrate that they developed their own experimental design. In survey essays, the weaker candidates relied too heavily on material copied from the Internet. Criterion L Reasoning surrounding the research and its limitations Generally, candidates did not perform well in this criterion. In s urvey essays, little or no attempt was made to assess the quality of the sources used. Back -of -the-envelope calculations were extremely rare. EXTENDED ESSSAY REPORTS – MAY 2003 Some candidates were not aware of the need to provide support for their statements and to be aware of the quality of the information they provided. In many laboratory essays, the error analysis was completely flawed or ignored. In some cases, uncertainties were mostly dealt with in a mechanical fashion but with little further comment on their relevance. The connectio n of the size of the uncertainty to the experimental design was rarely made. Significant figures were at times ignored, even if uncertainties were included as well as calculations of errors. The percentage difference between the experimental value and the accepted value did not represent the error in an experiment as suggested by some candidates who ignored the uncertainty attached to the experimental value or did not app reciate its significance. Recommendations for the supervision of future candidates Supervision The supervisor carries specific responsibilities as defined in the Guide for Extended Essays (May 1999) and plays an acti ve role. Guidance and encouragement are essential aspects of supervision. The supervisor should: · · · · · · · · · help candidates to choose a realistic and suitable research question that represents an “in -depth study of a limited topic restricted to physics” monitor closely and continually the progress of candidates, offering advice during the drafting and the development of the essay (e.g. “verify your units!, check this law!”…) show candidates examples of well - written articles or essays in physics make the Guide (including general and subject criteria) available to candidates assure that the essay is in fact the product of the candidate’s w ork and, if necessary, spot plagiarism in the case of essays involving out -of-school l...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2011 for the course CHEM 102 taught by Professor Tina during the Spring '11 term at Global.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online