This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: ECON W3211.002 Intermediate Microeconomics Problem Set 4 Due Monday, October 11, 2010 1. Perloff, Chapter 5: 30, 34, 36 30. Since pie and ice cream are complements, we may assume that she always eats them in the sam proportion, say Q p = Q c , where is a positive constant. Denote P p and P c are the prices of pie and ice cream, respectively. Let I be Olivias income. Then P p Q p + P c Q c = I P p Q p + P c Q p = I Q p ( P p + P c ) = I Thus the demand function for pie is Q p = I P p + P c and Similarly, the demand func tion for ice cream is Q c = I P p + P c 34. Notice that  MRS  = MU C MU B = B C = 1 2 . If ( C,B ) is an equilibrium, then it must satisfy the following conditions: (1) Optimality:  MRS  = MU C MU B = P C P B . (2) Feasibility: P C C + P B B I . From the optimality, we get P C P B = 1 2 = B C , and from the feasibility, 2 B + C = 120 . Hence the equilibrium consumption bundle is ( C * ,B * ) = (60 , 30) . After tax, optimal ity condition implies...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 10/03/2011 for the course ECON W3211 taught by Professor Elmes during the Fall '09 term at Columbia.
 Fall '09
 Elmes
 Microeconomics

Click to edit the document details