EN-AVT-167-14 - Shape Representation Wahid Ghaly 1455 de...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Wahid Ghaly 1455 de Maisonneuve, West MIE Dept., EV 4.151 Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, CANADA Ghaly@encs.concordia.ca ABSTRACT Shape representation is an integral part of any shape optimization problem. This representation is usually used in generating the geometric model, referred to as the CAD model that is used later on for generating the computational mesh used in e.g. aerodynamic, thermodynamic or structure simulations. Geometry representation can be feature-based, design parameter-based, global or local, parametric or point-wise. This paper presents and assesses different geometric representations of axial turbine and compressor blades used in gas turbines, and their effect on the design space and the optimization process. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The shape representation that is used in a given application should be accurate, flexible and robust; it should involve the minimum number of design parameters (unless an adjoint-based optimization method is used), these parameters are lately used as design variables. Such representation should also be suitable for the intended application, i.e. it should relate to the design parameters and should preferably use a CAD-native parameterization either directly or through e.g. an Application Programming Interface (API). In this paper, we will demonstrate that the geometric representation can make the optimization approach more efficient, moreover it can reduce the complexity of a given design problem. The applications that are considered in this work are at the component level optimization, e.g. a single or multi-stage turbine or compressor with single or multi-objective. Shapes include airfoils in two- dimensional (2D) flows and complete blades in three-dimensional (3D) flows. The representations vary from a global low fidelity to a local/global high fidelity representation. Shape representations take almost as many different forms as the number of researchers using automatic shape optimization. They vary from very simplistic ones to fairly complex ones; these representations vary in flexibility, accuracy, smoothness and generality. One way to categorize them is as follows: Point-wise representation of geometries, where the surface mesh (on e.g. the blade in internal flow or the wing in external flow) or a geometric representation thereof [1, 2] are taken as the design variables. This approach is used typically in conjunction with adjoint-based optimization methods since the number of design variables does not affect the complexity of the optimization method. The geometry is smoothed out during the optimization process and, in cases where a geometric representation is used, the modified surface mesh is propagated into that geometric representation using a basis space of independent perturbation functions of the Hicks Henne type. Examples of this approach are given in Reuther and Jameson [1] for external flow and in Wang et al. [2] for internal flow. RTO-EN-AVT-167
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/29/2011 for the course AEROSAPACE 101 taught by Professor Kumar during the Spring '11 term at IIT Kanpur.

Page1 / 17

EN-AVT-167-14 - Shape Representation Wahid Ghaly 1455 de...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online