This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: o victims and victimized communities. Restorative justice differs most
clearly from retributive justice (see Table I) in its view of crime as more than simply lawbreaking
-- or a violation of government authority. Rather, what is most significant about criminal
behavior is the harm to victims, communities and offenders that is its result. The most important
function of justice is to ensure that this harm is repaired.5
The interest in restorative justice has been fueled by the crime victims' movement, the positive
experience with reparative sanctions for juvenile offenders, the rise of informal neighborhood
justice and dispute resolution processes, and new thinking on equity and human relationships.
Support for restorative justice has also benefited from increasing skepticism about the supposed
preventive and deterrent effects of the current system and a general sense of frustration with the
retributive paradigm and its detachment from the real problems of victims, offenders and
communities (see sidebar).
Restorative justice offers a different “lens” for viewing the problem of crime and provides a new
outlook on the appropriate public response to the harm...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/01/2011 for the course CRJU 4230 taught by Professor Derekallen during the Spring '10 term at Georgia State University, Atlanta.
- Spring '10