Madonald vs. Chicago - Madonald vs. Chicago is a lawsuit...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Madonald vs. Chicago is a lawsuit brought to the United States Supreme Court that argues against the unconstitutionality of Chicago’s handgun bans. The case was first brought to the district court of the northern Illinois district. After the court’s decision in favor of the city of Chicago, the case was taken to the court of appeals and subsequently to the SCOTUS as a certiorari (which is a request of the use of judicial review). The case was taken to court because of the city’s regulations on gun possession and handling. Chicago does not allow the registration of firearms which in any given cause would allow the city to take control of the guns. Also in many areas of the city guns are completely prohibited and that is why the case is being reviewed by the Supreme Court, because the second amendment states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". The representation of this Amendment was brought to light in the case of The District of Columbia vs. Heller in which the district was sued by six citizens because the city prohibited and regulated the possession of firearms, even within residences. After bringing the case to the district court where it was dismissed, the case was then taken to the supreme court which held that the citizens rights to possess firearms within
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Madonald vs. Chicago - Madonald vs. Chicago is a lawsuit...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online