Dred Scott_Plessy_Brown

Dred Scott_Plessy_Brown - Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) 1)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) 1) MAJORITY (7): Justice Taney 3) Defining blacks out: Black people—slave or free—are not accounted for in the U.S. Constitution a. Congress had no power to prevent slavery in states b. Slaves, not citizens, cannot sue in court c. Slaves, property, cannot be taken away from owner w/o due process 4) Racial Exclusion: exceptions of who belongs a. Racial reasons b. Political reasons 5) Ability of Congress to forbid slavery 6) Broke legal precedent of “once free, always free”, no matter where in the country? 7) Key : Scott already at advantage; due to Justice Taney’s use of reference back to ORIGONAL INTENT of the Constitution (and its relation to who those allocated rights are for) a. Are black people members of the political community? b. Does Scott even have the right to bring his case to the court? b.i. Legal standing? b.ii. Taney’s answer: NOT included & NOT intended to be included in the Constitution; b.iii. Cannot claim any of the rights
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/09/2011 for the course DOC 2 taught by Professor Wimberley during the Winter '08 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 2

Dred Scott_Plessy_Brown - Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) 1)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online