Intl Security 25 ReviewSession

Intl Security 25 ReviewSession - 25ReviewSession...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
25 Review Session Oil spot strategy Secure one area Link up an you’ll cover the whole country Those 2 pieces about 2 things  How to deal with  counter-insurgency (Gintino/Gentil)Argument:  o the way its embraced by US military there is too much emphasis  given o political and not enough o kinetic Natios argument is opposite o US didn’t give enough attention to political side in Vietnam and  this has spilled over to Iraq Pre-delegation: I know what the Constitution says but I am going to choose  where the authority goes (even though technically it is a violation of the  Constitution) However the President’s council might argue that that is one of his  powers In these circumstances, there wouldn’t be time for a Supreme Court  decision Likely he wouldn’t pre-delegate, but simple delegation Devolution is 100% Constitutional  Drawbacks of the RMA Persuasive versus Active Dissuasion   convince them that it is pointless for them to attack By defense   There is no way they can get to the US so we may as  well not attack o This can cause them to attack tourist Active   be prepared to deal with attack, deal with the consequences  (ex// shelters in NY city, etc)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/14/2011 for the course PSCI 151 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '11 term at UPenn.

Page1 / 4

Intl Security 25 ReviewSession - 25ReviewSession...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online