Lecture 7(Monday) - vacuous truth We've already separated implication from quanti cation so we can make sense of P x A Q(x It's true except when

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: vacuous truth We've already separated implication from quanti cation, so we can make sense of P x ( ) A Q(x) It's true, except when P (x) is true and Q(x) is false. In particular, an implication is always true when the antecedent is false. For example, if your eyes wander to the consequent in V PR x ;x 2 2 x +2=0Ax>x+5 . . . you could jump to the conclusion that the implication is false. Vacuous truth works because there are no counterexamples. Another way of thinking about this is that the empty set is a subset of every other set. All employees earning over 80 trillion dollars are female. All employees earning over 80 trillion dollars are male. All employees earning over 80 trillion dollars have mauve eyeballs and breathe ammonia. slide 2 equivalence Suppose Al quits. Now consider the statement: Every male employees earns between 25,000 and 45,000. Is the statement true? What about its converse? Employee Gender Salary Betty Carlos Doug Ellen Flo Gwen female male male female female female 500 40,000 30,000 50,000 20,000 95,000 An employee is male if, and only if, that employee earns 25,000{45,000. This is a double implication, P A Q and Q A P , or P D Q. Thought of as sets, they are equal (mutual subsets). slide 3 more equivalence How do you feel about Break it into two implications: x x V PR x ;x 2 2 x x + 2 = 0 D x > x + 5: V PR V PR ;x + 2 = 0 A x > x + 5: 2 ; x > x + 5 A x 2x + 2 = 0: 2 2 The truth values are the same. English phrases: P is necessary and sucient for Q. P is true exactly when Q is true. P implies Q, and conversely. slide 4 symbolic idiom Some expressions for restricting domains are more common than others. \Every V P x D D that is a P is also a Q." Usually Vx P D; P (x) A Q(x). Less common P; Q(x). What about Vx P D; P (x) Q(x) ( means \and")? \Some that is a is also a ." Usually W P W P . What about W P ( )A D P Q x x D P Q x D; P x D; P x Q x ( )? ( ) Q(x). Less common slide 5 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/13/2011 for the course COMPUTER S CSC 165 taught by Professor Dannyheap during the Fall '10 term at University of Toronto- Toronto.

Page1 / 4

Lecture 7(Monday) - vacuous truth We've already separated implication from quanti cation so we can make sense of P x A Q(x It's true except when

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online