Measurements indicate that the surface temperature of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: erial, determine (a) the temperature of the oil when the pipe leaves the lake, (b) the rate of heat transfer from the oil, and (c) the pumping power required to overcome the pressure losses and to maintain the flow of the oil in the pipe. Icy lake, 0°C 20°C Oil 2 m/s D = 0.3 m Te 0°C 200 m FIGURE 8–23 Schematic for Example 8–3. SOLUTION Oil flows in a pipeline that passes through icy waters of a lake at 0°C. The exit temperature of the oil, the rate of heat loss, and the pumping power needed to overcome pressure losses are to be determined. Assumptions 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 The surface temperature of the pipe is very nearly 0°C. 3 The thermal resistance of the pipe is negligible. 4 The inner surfaces of the pipeline are smooth. 5 The flow is hydrodynamically developed when the pipeline reaches the lake. Properties We do not know the exit temperature of the oil, and thus we cannot determine the bulk mean temperature, which is the temperature at which the properties of oil are to be evaluated. The mean temperature of the oil at the inlet is 20°C, and we expect this temperature to drop somewhat as a result of heat loss to the icy waters of the lake. We evaluate the properties of the oil at the inlet temperature, but we will repeat the calculations, if necessary, using properties at the evaluated bulk mean temperature. At 20°C we read (Table A-14) k 888 kg/m3 0.145 W/m °C Cp Pr 901 10 6 m2/s 1880 J/kg °C 10,400 Analysis (a) The Reynolds number is m Dh Re (2 m/s)(0.3 m) 901 10 6 m2/s 666 which is less than the critical Reynolds number of 2300. Therefore, the flow is laminar, and the thermal entry length in this case is roughly Lt 0.05 Re Pr D 0.05 666 10,400 (0.3 m) 104,000 m which is much greater than the total length of the pipe. This is typical of fluids with high Prandtl numbers. Therefore, we assume thermally developing flow and determine the Nusselt number from Nu hD k 3.66 37.3 3.66 1 1 0.065 (D/L) Re Pr 0.04 [(D/L) Re Pr]2/3 0.065(0.3/200) 0.04[(0.3/200) 666 666 10,400 10,400]2/3 cen58933_ch08.qxd 9/4/2002 11:29 AM Page 440 440 HEAT TRANSFER Note that this Nusselt number is considerably higher than the fully developed value of 3.66. Then, h k Nu D 0.145 W/m (37.3) 0.3 m 18.0 W/m2 °C Also, As · m pL Ac m DL (0.3 m)(200 m) 188.5 m2 (888 kg/m3)[1 (0.3 m)2](2 m/s) 125.5 kg/s 4 Next we determine the exit temperature of oil from · Ti) exp ( hAs /m Cp) (18.0 W/m2 · °C)(188.5 m2) 0°C [(0 20)°C] exp (125.5 kg/s)(1880 J/kg · °C) 19.71°C Te Ts (Ts Thus, the mean temperature of oil drops by a mere 0.29°C as it crosses the lake. This makes the bulk mean oil temperature 19.86°C, which is practically identical to the inlet temperature of 20°C. Therefore, we do not need to reevaluate the properties. (b) The logarithmic mean temperature difference and the rate of heat loss from the oil are Tln · Q Ti Te 20 19.71 19.85°C Ts Te 0 19.71 ln ln 0 20 Ts Ti hAs Tln (18.0 W/m2 °C)(188.5 m2)( 19.85°C) 6.74 104 Therefore, the oil will lose heat at a rate of 67.4 kW as it flows through the pipe in the icy waters of the lake. Note that Tln is identical to the arithmetic mean temperature in this case, since Ti Te. (c) The laminar flow of oil is hydrodynamically developed. Therefore, the friction factor can be determined from f 64 Re 64 666 0.0961 Then the pressure drop in the pipe and the required pumping power become P · Wpump 3 2 2 200 m (888 kg/m )(2 m/s) m L 0.0961 1.14 D2 0.3 m 2 5 2 · m P (125.5 kg/s)(1.14 10 N/m ) 16.1 kW 3 888 kg/m f 105 N/m2 Discussion We will need a 16.1-kW pump just to overcome the friction in the pipe as the oil flows in the 200-m-long pipe through the lake. cen58933_ch08.qxd 9/4/2002 11:29 AM Page 441 441 CHAPTER 8 8–6 I TURBULENT FLOW IN TUBES We mentioned earlier that flow in smooth tubes is fully turbulent for Re 10,000. Turbulent flow is commonly utilized in practice because of the higher heat transfer coefficients associated with it. Most correlations for the friction and heat transfer coefficients in turbulent flow are based on experimental studies because of the difficulty in dealing with turbulent flow theoretically. For smooth tubes, the friction factor in turbulent flow can be determined from the explicit first Petukhov equation [Petukhov (1970), Ref. 21] given as Smooth tubes: f (0.790 ln Re 1.64) 2 104 Re 106 (8-65) The Nusselt number in turbulent flow is related to the friction factor through the Chilton–Colburn analogy expressed as Nu 0.125 f RePr1/3 (8-66) Once the friction factor is available, this equation can be used conveniently to evaluate the Nusselt number for both smooth and rough tubes. For fully developed turbulent flow in smooth tubes, a simple relation for the Nusselt number can be obtained by substituting the simple power law relation f 0.184 Re 0.2 for the friction factor into Eq. 8–66. It gives Nu 0.7 Re 0.023 Re0.8 Pr1/3 Pr 160 10,000 (8-67) which is known as the Colburn equation. The accuracy of this equation can be improved by...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/28/2010 for the course HEAT ENG taught by Professor Ghaz during the Spring '10 term at University of Guelph.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online