This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Pvalue was less than the α value, we can conclude that the results are statistically significant and thus we can reject H o and assume H a . We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean diameter is significantly greater than 8.20mm. b) State: What is a 95% confidence interval estimate for the true mean diameter of the metal rods from this machine? Formulate: Observational study. Calculate a one sample t confidence interval for the true mean. The parameter is the true mean rod diameter, and the population is all metal rods from that machine. Use a level of confidence of 95%. Solve: See above for data plot and condition checks. (xbar) = 8.234mm. s = .025298mm. df = n–1 = 15–1 = 14 t confidence interval: (xbar) ± t * s / ( n^½) = 8.234 ± 2.145(.025298/[15^½]) = 8.234 ± 0.014 = (8.220, 8.248) Conclude: We are 95% confident that the true mean diameter of the metal rods produced by this machine is somewhere between 8.220mm and 8.248mm....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 10/17/2011 for the course STAT 221 taught by Professor Collings during the Winter '08 term at BYU.
 Winter '08
 Collings
 Statistics

Click to edit the document details