14 PA & Prevention NIDDM,HTN_jp-1.ppt

14 PA & Prevention NIDDM,HTN_jp-1.ppt - PA & OBESITY...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–7. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PA & T2D (Case Study #2) A patient with the following profile comes in for a check-up: Age : 31 Sex : F Ht : 5’4” Wt : 190 lbs. BMI : 32.5 kg/m 2 Total Cholesterol : 209 mg/dL HDL : 34 mg/dL BP : 140/89 mmHg Fasting Glucose : 130 mg/dL PA Status : Sedentary Other : Gestational diabetes during pregnancy of last child Based on information presented in class, describe how you would assess this patient, then design and rationalize a physical activity program for this patient. CV Risks to Target: Frequency : Intensity : Time : Type : Rationale : Expected Improvements : Timeline for Improvements : PA & OBESITY (Case Study #1) A patient with the following profile comes in for a check-up: Age : 19 Sex : M Ht : 5’10” Wt : 310 lbs. BMI : 44.5 kg/m 2 Waist Circumference : 112 cm Physical Activity Status : Sedentary Based on information presented in class, describe how you would assess this patient, then design and rationalize a physical activity program for this patient. •What weight loss goal would you set for this patient? Timeline? What health benefits might you expect with continued weight loss? (at least 5) •Discuss how exercise training might be involved in the weight loss program? •What studies inform your decision & Why?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Physical Activity and  PRIMARY  Prevention of  Diabetes and  Hypertension Subtitle: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of  cure. - Benjamin Franklin
Background image of page 2
Helmrich et al Study Design Long-term follow-up of 5990 University of  Pennsylvania male alumni Only included those not diabetic in 1962 Asked by questionnaire if they had been  subsequently diagnosed as a diabetic 202 developed NIDDM from 1962 to 1976 Physical activity measured with Paffenbarger  questionnaire Reading #36
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Table 1. Age-Adjusted Rates of NIDDM Among 5990 Men, 1962 to  1976, According to Measures of Physical Activity in 1962.   R ELATIVE  R ISK P HYSICAL   A CTIVITY   I NDEX,  1962   (kcal/wk) A LL   A CTIVITIES A LL   A CTIVITIES   E XCEPT   V IGOROUS   S PORTS V IGOROUS   S PORTS   O NLY < 500 1.00 1.00 1.00 500 – 999 0.94 0.97 0.69 1000 – 1499 0.79 0.87 --- 1500 – 1999 0.78 0.92 0.53 2000 – 2499 0.68 0.75 0.86 2500 – 2999 0.90 1.29 0.56 3000 – 3499 0.86 1.03 0.40 ≥ 3500 0.52 0.48 0.46 P-Value for Trend 0.01 0.07 0.05
Background image of page 4
Table 2. Age-Adjusted Rates of NIDDM Among 5990 Men, 1962  to 1976, According to Type of Physical Activity in 1962. A CTIVITY R ELATIVE  R ISK P-V ALUE F OR  T REND Sports played         None 1.00 0.02     Moderate only 0.90     Vigorous only 0.69     Moderate and vigorous 0.65 Flights of stairs climbed  per day*          < 5 1.00       5 – 14 0.78 0.07     ≥ 15 0.75   Blocks walked per day         > 5 1.00 0.80     5 – 14 1.31     ≥ 15 0.93 * Each flight included 10 steps
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Table 3. Age-Specific and Age-Adjusted Rates of NIDDM Among  5990 Men, 1962 to 1976, According to Selected Risk Factors in 1962.
Background image of page 6
Image of page 7
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/18/2011 for the course KNES 260 taught by Professor Hagberg during the Spring '08 term at Maryland.

Page1 / 54

14 PA & Prevention NIDDM,HTN_jp-1.ppt - PA & OBESITY...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 7. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online