Budget Constraint

Budget Constraint - As long as their M v x was less than.95y they would purchase more x and move away from their original bundle price in essence

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Jerry Imel Economics 301-2 Intermediate Moment #4 02/01/2011 The typical consumer had a cost of living increase equal to 8.5% ($850). This was calculated by the following method: = = 8.5% Using the same method, The consumer who apportioned her income between X and Y equal to 20 and 80 percent, saw a cost of living increase equal to 9%. The consumer who apportioned her income between X and Y equal to 50 and 50 percent, saw a cost of living increase equal to 7.5%. If all three consumers had their income raised equal to 8.5% (consumers cost of living), they would all be able to purchase more X, as its cost went from 1 x = 1 y to 1 x = .95 y.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: As long as their M v x was less than .95y, they would purchase more x, and move away from their original bundle price, in essence they would be “better off”. The consumer who apportioned her income 50/50 between X and Y will gain, as her cost of living only went up by $750, but she was compensated for $850. The typical consumer would break even, and the person who apportioned 20x and 80y, would lose, since she lost $900 to inflation and she was only compensated for $850....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/09/2011 for the course ECON 301 taught by Professor Davis during the Spring '11 term at Ball State.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online