This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 3. Progress Even if you think their definition is legitimate, you should still vote for the counter-interpretation in order to move towards a better justice. We ought to give each his due because there is nothing fairer or morally commendable. 4. Ground the point of their case is to hijack literature 5. Policy-guiding D. Voters: Fairness is a pre-standard reason to vote because debate is a competitive activity that needs to rules to deter abusive incentives to win. Education is a pre-standard reason to vote affirmative because debate is an education activity. Allowing these arguments to prevail will destabilize debates legitimate work ethic. And because schools will fund debate only if its an educational activity, eliminating that characteristic would destroy the activity...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 10/10/2011 for the course PHIL 160 taught by Professor Coakley during the Spring '11 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '11