This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: A line with slope equal 45 degrees has been drawn to facilitate the comparison between the two methods of determining pile capacity. A regression line with the corresponding equation and R 2 is shown in the plot. This latter graph is ideal to visually determine how scattered the predictions are for each method. The second graph (Figure 6-2, PDA at BOR) presents the ratio of measured to predicted capacity on the vertical axis and the measured 52 y = 0.9966x R 2 = 0.4851 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 2000 4000 6000 8000 Davisson Capacity (kN) Figure 6-1. Davisson Capacity vs. PDA BOR Capacity 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Davisson Capacity (kN) Cases=42 Mean=1.036 Standard Dev.=0.32 Figure 6-2. Measured Over Predicted Capacity for PDA at BOR...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 10/19/2011 for the course TTE 4004c taught by Professor Hass during the Spring '11 term at University of Florida.
- Spring '11