65_HWKTTE 4004c - 4.00 1 ENR cases=71 mean=0.24 std...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 0123456 Davisson Capacity / BOR Capacity 1 ENR cases=71 mean=0.24 std dev=0.16 2 Modified ENR cases=63 mean=0.36 std dev=0.25 3 FDOT cases=63 mean=2.57 std dev=1.29 4 Gates cases=71 mean=1.89 std dev=0.72 5 Energy cases=72 mean=0.84 std dev=0.30 6 CAPWAP cases=79 mean=1.26 std dev.=0.44 7 PDA cases=42 mean=1.04 std dev=0.32 8 Japanese Energy cases=52 mean=1.46 std dev=0.78 5 2 1 6 3 4 7 8 Figure 6-4. Log Normal Probability Distribution at BOR
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
56 It was then decided to study the old methods under three circumstances, first, for piles with Davisson capacity less than 1779 kN, second, for pile with capacity larger than 1779 kN, and finally for the all cases. Based solely on the statistical analysis and the lognormal probability distribution, the assessment of the eight dynamic methods to determine pile capacity could not be successfully completed (i.e. no criterion). The LRFD resistance factor was then recommended to assess the performance of each method. In the next section, a description of the LRFD results is presented.
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/19/2011 for the course TTE 4004c taught by Professor Hass during the Spring '11 term at University of Florida.

Page1 / 2

65_HWKTTE 4004c - 4.00 1 ENR cases=71 mean=0.24 std...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online