73_HWKTTE 4004c - 63 and resistance factor of 2.574 and 0.97 respectively for the same reliability index This effect could be explained in terms of

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
63 and resistance factor of 2.574 and 0.97 respectively for the same reliability index. This effect could be explained in terms of the bias factors meaning. As defined in the preceding chapters, the bias factor is the ratio of measured to predicted capacity. Then, a large bias factor means a very conservative method and the result is a higher resistance factor. Although the resistance factor is a good qualitative method to determine the degree of conservatism or unconservatism, it does not indicate the accuracy of the method. The combination of both, mean and standard deviation through the COV R (i.e. ratio of standard deviation to the mean or bias) has proved to be a good indicator of the accuracy of the methods. Under this criterion, the new methods such as PDA, Paikowsky, and CAPWAP have the best accuracy, while ENR and modified ENR have the worst accuracy. φ/λ R Ratio The efficiency or performance of the dynamic methods can be evaluated by the ratio of φ/λ R , indicating the percentage of the measured Davisson capacity that can be
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/19/2011 for the course TTE 4004c taught by Professor Hass during the Spring '11 term at University of Florida.

Page1 / 2

73_HWKTTE 4004c - 63 and resistance factor of 2.574 and 0.97 respectively for the same reliability index This effect could be explained in terms of

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online