ch5 - ch5 1. On November 8, 2011, Power Corp. sold land to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ch5 1. On November 8, 2011, Power Corp. sold land to Wood Co., its wholly owned subsidiary. The land cost $61,500 and was sold to Wood for $89,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the gain on the sale of the land realized? A. Proportionately over a designated period of years. B. When Wood Co. sells the land to a third party. C. No gain can be recognized. D. As Wood uses the land. E. When Wood Co. begins using the land productively. Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Stendall Co. on January 1, 2011. During 2011, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Stendall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Stendall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2011. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2011 was $2,140,000 because of a consolidating adjustment for intra-entity sales less the entire profit remaining in Stendall's ending inventory. 2. How would consolidated cost of goods sold have differed if the inventory transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar? A. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have remained $2,140,000. B. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been more than $2,140,000 because of the controlling interest in the subsidiary. C. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been less than $2,140,000 because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary. D. Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been more than $2,140,000 because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary. E. The effect on consolidated cost of goods sold cannot be predicted from the information provided. 3. How would noncontrolling interest in net income have differed if the transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar? A. Noncontrolling interest in net income would have decreased by $6,000. B. Noncontrolling interest in net income would have increased by $24,000. C. Noncontrolling interest in net income would have increased by $20,000. D. Noncontrolling interest in net income would have decreased by $18,000. E. Noncontrolling interest in net income would have decreased by $56,000. 4. On January 1, 2011, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the noncontrolling interest's share of consolidated net income ? A. $3,600. B. $22,800. C. $30,900. D. $32,900. E. $40,800. 5. Webb Co. acquired 100% of Rand Inc. on January 5, 20011. During 2011, Webb sold goods to Rand for $2,400,000 that cost Webb $1,800,000. Rand still owned 40% of the goods at the end of the year. Cost of goods sold was $10,800,000 for Webb and $6,400,000 for Rand. What was consolidated cost of goods sold ?...
View Full Document

Page1 / 79

ch5 - ch5 1. On November 8, 2011, Power Corp. sold land to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online