This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 1) Not only did Ollens stab the victim, he also slashed the victims throat. 2) Knife was used in the killing, he had to procure the weapon 3) Evidence of Ollens struck the victim from behind, meaning he initiated the conflict. 4) Jury can find a motive, because Ollens just finished with a robbery. Holding: Yes, Jury would have the 4 items to look at above, to see if the defendant had premeditated the act of killing. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences: Justice Callow Concur Wanted to mention that just because there was a knife involve, does not mean it was procured for this incident, it couldve been habitually on him....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 10/18/2011 for the course CRIM LAW 110 taught by Professor Wade during the Spring '11 term at California Western School of Law.
- Spring '11