Chicago v. Morales119 S. Ct. 1849 (1999)Justice Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg.opinion on Parts 1,2,5 and Souter& Ginsburg with 3, 4,6It concerns an ordinance where, it does not allow gang members to loiter in groups. Only Gang specialist can make these arrests. Has 4 parts. First, offer must reasonably believe that at least 1 of the 2 or more persons in a public place, is a criminal street gang member. Second, Person must be loitering, remaining in the same place for no reason.Third, Office must then order everyone to remove themselves from the areaFourth, if they disobey the order, that person is guilty of violating the ordinance.They trained special people to identify criminal gang members, and it was only enforced in designated areas, not released to the public. 89k dispersal orders. 42k people arrested for violating the ordinance.Not that laws against gangs are unconstitutional, but this ordinance is too vague. The terms “to remain in any one place with no apparent purpose” do not give due process because it is so vague
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.