Unformatted text preview: a crime, is entitled to continue to walk the public streets only at the whim of any police officer who happens to stop that individual under 647. This provides a convient tool for harsh and discriminatory enforcement by local prosecuting officials.’ Penal cold was considered unconstitutionally vague . The standards aren’t impossible, but the further precision in the language isn’t impossible or impractical either. So bottom line, penal code was overturned, because there is a lack of due process (in terms of, the people don’t know what kind of “credible and reliable” identification they need to provide. Also the terms reasonable suspicion is a red flag in my mind....
View Full Document
- Spring '11
- criminal law, terms reasonable suspicion