{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

CB Knowles v. Iowa - minimum risk(comparatively and no...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Knowles v. Iowa 525 U.S. 113 (1998) Fact: Procedural Facts: Trial Court did not suppress the evidence. Iowa Supreme court affirmed it. US Supreme court Operative Facts: Knowles was speeding 43 mph on a 25 mph zone. Police officer issued him a citation, and searched the car. He found a bag of marijuana and a “pot pipe.” Issue: Broad Question: Does the arrest-power rule apply when police officers give a citation? Narrow Question: Rule: The exception to the warrant and 4 th amendment clause (arrest-power rule) applies when Officers needs to disarm the suspect in order to take him into custody, and the need to preserve evidence for later use at trial Rational: When an officer issues a citation, they are generally a very brief encounter, with
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: minimum risk (comparatively), and no extra evidence will be necessary to prosecute them. There are other independent bases to search for weapons and protect themselves from danger. Holding: The Supreme courts ruled that the arrest-power rule does not apply to officers when they stop cars to give citations. The risk is minimum compared to arresting, where there are a higher percent of stress and uncertainty. The officer may also perform other searches, such as ordering them out of the vehicle and perform a patdown of a driver and any passengers upon reasonable suspicion. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}