This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Algorithms Lecture 21: Maximum Flows and Minimum Cuts [ Fa’10 ] Col. Hogan: One of these wires disconnects the fuse, the other one fires the bomb. Which one would you cut, Shultz? Sgt. Schultz: Don’t ask me, this is a decision for an officer. Col. Hogan: All right. Which wire, Colonel Klink? Col. Klink: This one. [points to the white wire] Col. Hogan: You’re sure? Col. Klink: Yes. [Hogan cuts the black wire; the bomb stops ticking] Col. Klink: If you knew which wire it was, why did you ask me? Col. Hogan: I wasn’t sure which was the right one, but I was certain you’d pick the wrong one. — “A Klink, a Bomb, and a Short Fuse", Hogan’s Heroes (1966) Figure 2 From Harris and Ross [1955]: Schematic diagram of the railway network of the Western So viet Union and Eastern European countries, with a maximum flow of value 163,000 tons from Russia to Eastern Europe, and a cut of capacity 163,000 tons indicated as ‘The bottleneck’. The maxflow mincut theorem In the RAND Report of 19 November 1954, Ford and Fulkerson [1954] gave (next to defining the maximum flow problem and suggesting the simplex method for it) the maxflow min cut theorem for undirected graphs, saying that the maximum flow value is equal to the minimum capacity of a cut separating source and terminal. Their proof is not constructive, but for planar graphs, with source and sink on the outer boundary, they give a polynomial time, constructive method. In a report of 26 May 1955, Robacker [1955a] showed that the maxflow mincut theorem can be derived also from the vertexdisjoint version of Menger’s theorem. As for the directed case, Ford and Fulkerson [1955] observed that the maxflow mincut theorem holds also for directed graphs. Dantzig and Fulkerson [1955] showed, by extending the results of Dantzig [1951a] on integer solutions for the transportation problem to the 25 Harris and Ross’s map of the Warsaw Pact rail network 21 Maximum Flows and Minimum Cuts In the mid1950s, Air Force researchers T. E. Harris and F. S. Ross published a classified report studying the rail network that linked the Soviet Union to its satellite countries in Eastern Europe. The network was modeled as a graph with 44 vertices, representing geographic regions, and 105 edges, representing links between those regions in the rail network. Each edge was given a weight, representing the rate at which material could be shipped from one region to the next. Essentially by trial and error, they determined both the maximum amount of stuff that could be moved from Russia into Europe, as well as the cheapest way to disrupt the network by removing links (or in less abstract terms, blowing up train tracks), which they called ‘the bottleneck’. Their results (including the figure at the top of the page) were only declassified in 1999....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 10/14/2011 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Smith during the Spring '11 term at West Virginia University Institute of Technology.
 Spring '11
 Smith

Click to edit the document details